JellyBlue Official Website › Choosing A Gummy
Choosing A GummyChoosing a male vitality gummy: a ten-point checklist
Ten questions to ask of any bottle in this aisle, in the order that matters.
The first one decides whether the other nine can be answered at all: if the panel carries a proprietary blend, nothing below it can be checked. Each point is scored below against the product this desk sells, including the four where it does not score well.
Written to be used on somebody else's bottle as well as on this one. Print it, or keep it open while you read a panel.
The ten points, scored in public
| Question | Why it matters | JellyBlue |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Is every amount printed? | A proprietary blend gives one total for the whole formula. Without individual amounts, nothing below this line can be checked at all. | Yes. Seven actives, seven individual milligram figures, no blend row anywhere on the panel. |
| 2. Does the advertising match the panel? | Hold the listing graphic against the back of the bottle and count both. | No. The graphic names six and prints SIX NAMED INGREDIENTS; the panel names seven. Beet root extract at 50 mg is the difference, and this desk found it by counting. |
| 3. Is the total active weight serious? | Under 100 mg for a whole botanical formula is decorative. Several hundred is a formula that intends something. | Yes. 650 mg a gummy, which is high for a chewable. |
| 4. Does any single amount match a trial dose? | Take the largest figure on the panel and find the dose its own trials used. | Yes, one. Tongkat ali at 200 mg, the dose a twelve-week trial in 105 ageing men used. The other six sit below their trial doses or have none to compare with. |
| 5. Is the extract specified? | An amount without a preparation is half an answer, especially for tongkat ali, where the trials used a named standardised extract. | No. The panel prints 200 mg and does not say which extract or at what standardisation. |
| 6. Is there a stimulant hiding in it? | Caffeine is common in this aisle and is often what a buyer actually feels. | No. Nothing on this panel is a stimulant, caffeine included, so whatever the daily energy phrase is resting on, it is not that. |
| 7. How much sugar? | A chewable carries some, because sugar is part of what makes it a gummy. | 1.5 g a gummy, 45 g over a bottle, at six calories, from cane sugar and glucose syrup. |
| 8. Is there a lot number you can trace? | A production run reference is how a query or a recall is traced, and how a desk matches your bottle to your order. | Yes. Lot JEL-26/JE-5599 and certificate reference JEL-5599-26-JE, printed on the bottle and on this website. Neither is a laboratory result and this site says so. |
| 9. Can you buy one unit to try? | The smallest purchase decides how much of a first order sits outside the refund window. | No. The ladder starts at two bottles, $158 plus postage. Two bottles is sixty gummies, which at least matches the window exactly. |
| 10. How is the guarantee counted? | From purchase, from dispatch or from delivery. They are not the same length, and from purchase is the shortest. | 60 days from purchase, which is the conservative count. Opened bottles accepted, return postage the buyer’s. |
Six pass, four do not. A checklist that scored the seller's own product ten out of ten would not be a checklist.
The four failures are worth reading on their own: the advertising undercounts the actives, the tongkat ali extract is unspecified, there is no single bottle, and therefore the smallest possible first order is $158 plus postage. Two of those are the seller’s choices and two are the format’s.
Why the first question decides the rest
A proprietary blend is permitted. The labelling rule requires a blend to declare its total weight and its ingredient names in descending order of predominance, and nothing more. That is a real disclosure and it is not a loophole.
It is also, from a buyer’s side of the counter, the end of the conversation. You can see six names and one number; you cannot see whether the first name is 90% of the total or 14% of it. Question three cannot be answered, question four cannot be answered, and question five is moot.
So the order of these ten questions is not arbitrary. Ask the first one, and if the answer is that there is a blend, the honest next step is to put that bottle down and pick up another one - not because a blend means something is wrong, but because it means you will never find out either way.
A panel without individual amounts is not dishonest. It is unfalsifiable, which is worse for a buyer and better for a seller.
Three questions this checklist deliberately leaves out
“How many stars does it have?”
Star ratings in this aisle are the seller’s own summary figures, and the published named reports under them are frequently a handful of people sharing two or three sentences. Count the distinct sentences before counting the stars.
“Is it clinically proven?”
Almost nothing in this category has been tested as a finished product. Seven ingredient literatures are not one product result, and a page claiming otherwise has told you something about itself.
“How many seals are on the bottle?”
Ten marks and two marks tell you the same thing: where it was made and what the ingredient list does not contain. None of them is a test of the contents. The panel is the document worth reading.
What a good score on this checklist does and does not mean
Six out of ten means a label a buyer can evaluate. It does not mean the gummy works, and nothing in this guide should be read that way.
What the ten points measure is whether you are being told enough to decide. In a category where a scored analysis of marketed products found only a small share carried effective ingredients at effective doses, and where a review of 52 studies found most of the ingredient names fail to do what they are sold for, being told enough to decide is the thing most worth having.
The gap between that and proof is real, and this desk would rather print it than sell around it.
Who wrote this checklist?
- 21 CFR 101.36, Nutrition labeling of dietary supplements. Electronic Code of Federal Regulations, Office of the Federal Register. https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-21/chapter-I/subchapter-B/part-101/subpart-F/section-101.36
- Petre GC, Francini-Pesenti F, Vitagliano A, et al. Dietary Supplements for Erectile Dysfunction: Analysis of Marketed Products, Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis and Rational Use. Nutrients. 2023;15(17):3677. PMID 37686709. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37686709/
- Morgado A, Tsampoukas G, Sokolakis I, et al. Do “testosterone boosters” really increase serum total testosterone? A systematic review. Int J Impot Res. 2024;36(4):348-364. PMID 37697053. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37697053/
- Chinnappan SM, George A, Pandey P, et al. Effect of Eurycoma longifolia standardised aqueous root extract-Physta on testosterone levels and quality of life in ageing male subjects: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled multicentre study. Food Nutr Res. 2021;65:5647. PMID 34262417. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34262417/
- Borrelli F, Colalto C, Delfino DV, et al. Herbal Dietary Supplements for Erectile Dysfunction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Drugs. 2018;78(6):643-673. PMID 29633089. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29633089/
- Health Products Compliance Guidance. Federal Trade Commission, Bureau of Consumer Protection, December 2022. https://www.ftc.gov/business-guidance/resources/health-products-compliance-guidance
- Using Dietary Supplements Wisely. National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health, National Institutes of Health. https://www.nccih.nih.gov/health/using-dietary-supplements-wisely
